madthumbs
17-07-06, 01:54
Stream or download the following:
Injustice For All - The International Criminal Court (ICC) (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=451)
Closely related to “The United Nations: A Look Into The Future” is a second video of crucial importance entitled “Injustice for All”, about the UN?s International Criminal Court (ICC). In the works for many years as another UN tentacle, the court is now being aggressively pushed for worldwide acceptance, including Senate approval in the United States. This riveting video gives us all the reasons why Senate ratification of this diabolical scheme must never happen.
Holding our attention with every word is a carefully chosen panel of speakers including William Norman Grigg and William F. Jasper, Dr. Charles Rice of the University of Notre Dame Law School, Attorney Nikola Kostich of Milwaukee, and Dr. Srdja Trifkovic of the Lord Byron Foundation.
From the differing areas of expertise of these fine speakers we learn the frightening facts of what the ICC would mean to each and every one of us. Posing as a defender of human rights with its gilded image of condemning “crimes against humanity,” the ICC is in reality a monstrosity bent on destroying all human rights. As Dr. Rice comments, the ICC means the total repeal of our constitutional order and Bill of Rights. It has no legitimate basis for its claimed authority and no accountability. It is its own prosecutor, jury, and appeals body.
The United Nations - A look into the Future (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=449)
Global Governance - The Quiet War Against American Independence (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=180)
In 1966, a Georgetown University professor published a big book about the elite Network which he said controls America. His book approved of their plan for global, or world, control to supersede our self-government by “We the people.” The professor had a profound effect on one of his students.
In 1992, that student became President of the United States and Bill Clinton credited Professor Carroll Quigley with forming his vision for the future. In the next several years, he pushed for several United Nations treaties (including some rejected by Presidents Reagan and Bush) which are designed to control human behavior, energy consumption, private property, and natural resources. The President issued a secret order (PDD 25) to place American armed forces under foreign command and in foreign uniform, and he began using U.S. troops as global cops and social workers. His Administration is steadily putting American trade and property under the control of international organizations.
“Global Governance: The Quiet War Against American Independence” contains exclusive interviews with national news makers on the front lines of the quiet war. This compelling program documents the treaties and UN conferences that are undermining American independence and paving the way for global control.
The U.N. Deception (2001) (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=162)
The U.N. Deception reports what the nightly news does not: the UN’s creators intended their organization to become a world government. Learn how top United Nations proponents exploit small arms, the environment, and justice to pressure Capitol Hill into quietly surrendering America’s heritage of freedom. Should these UN plans remain unopposed, the consequences are ultimately grim. There is, however, a way to avert this danger. Start by witnessing The U.N. Deception!
Washington Insider says Powell’s Speech was a Hoax (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=445)
Meet the insider who helped Prep Colin Powell for that U.N. speech making the case for war.
POWELL U.N. SPEECH: These are not assertions. What we’re giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence.
BRANCACCIO: Larry Wilkerson has now come to a very different conclusion.
WILKERSON: I participated in a hoax on the American people, the international community and the United Nations Security Council. How do you think that makes me feel?
BRANCACCIO: How did we get the intelligence so wrong?
WILKERSON: I would rather have the discussion and debate in the process we’ve designed than I would the dictat from a dumb strongman.
Injustice For All - The International Criminal Court (ICC) (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=451)
Closely related to “The United Nations: A Look Into The Future” is a second video of crucial importance entitled “Injustice for All”, about the UN?s International Criminal Court (ICC). In the works for many years as another UN tentacle, the court is now being aggressively pushed for worldwide acceptance, including Senate approval in the United States. This riveting video gives us all the reasons why Senate ratification of this diabolical scheme must never happen.
Holding our attention with every word is a carefully chosen panel of speakers including William Norman Grigg and William F. Jasper, Dr. Charles Rice of the University of Notre Dame Law School, Attorney Nikola Kostich of Milwaukee, and Dr. Srdja Trifkovic of the Lord Byron Foundation.
From the differing areas of expertise of these fine speakers we learn the frightening facts of what the ICC would mean to each and every one of us. Posing as a defender of human rights with its gilded image of condemning “crimes against humanity,” the ICC is in reality a monstrosity bent on destroying all human rights. As Dr. Rice comments, the ICC means the total repeal of our constitutional order and Bill of Rights. It has no legitimate basis for its claimed authority and no accountability. It is its own prosecutor, jury, and appeals body.
The United Nations - A look into the Future (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=449)
Global Governance - The Quiet War Against American Independence (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=180)
In 1966, a Georgetown University professor published a big book about the elite Network which he said controls America. His book approved of their plan for global, or world, control to supersede our self-government by “We the people.” The professor had a profound effect on one of his students.
In 1992, that student became President of the United States and Bill Clinton credited Professor Carroll Quigley with forming his vision for the future. In the next several years, he pushed for several United Nations treaties (including some rejected by Presidents Reagan and Bush) which are designed to control human behavior, energy consumption, private property, and natural resources. The President issued a secret order (PDD 25) to place American armed forces under foreign command and in foreign uniform, and he began using U.S. troops as global cops and social workers. His Administration is steadily putting American trade and property under the control of international organizations.
“Global Governance: The Quiet War Against American Independence” contains exclusive interviews with national news makers on the front lines of the quiet war. This compelling program documents the treaties and UN conferences that are undermining American independence and paving the way for global control.
The U.N. Deception (2001) (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=162)
The U.N. Deception reports what the nightly news does not: the UN’s creators intended their organization to become a world government. Learn how top United Nations proponents exploit small arms, the environment, and justice to pressure Capitol Hill into quietly surrendering America’s heritage of freedom. Should these UN plans remain unopposed, the consequences are ultimately grim. There is, however, a way to avert this danger. Start by witnessing The U.N. Deception!
Washington Insider says Powell’s Speech was a Hoax (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=445)
Meet the insider who helped Prep Colin Powell for that U.N. speech making the case for war.
POWELL U.N. SPEECH: These are not assertions. What we’re giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence.
BRANCACCIO: Larry Wilkerson has now come to a very different conclusion.
WILKERSON: I participated in a hoax on the American people, the international community and the United Nations Security Council. How do you think that makes me feel?
BRANCACCIO: How did we get the intelligence so wrong?
WILKERSON: I would rather have the discussion and debate in the process we’ve designed than I would the dictat from a dumb strongman.